Public Law — Judicial Defense of Public Entities
A public entity faced a direct reparation claim based on alleged State extracontractual liability. AZC built a technical, evidence-driven defense that led to a favorable outcome, with no declaration of patrimonial liability against the entity.
The entity was sued through a direct reparation action in proceedings that tested the elements of State extracontractual liability: the existence of unlawful damage, its attribution to the entity, and the causal link between the State conduct and the claimed harm. The defense had to navigate a complex evidentiary record and a claimant narrative seeking to attribute the entirety of the alleged damages to the entity.
AZC designed the defense around three coordinated fronts: a rigorous evidentiary analysis of the record, the construction of the attribution theory applicable to the case, and the study of exoneration grounds and the absence of liability elements as corresponded to the file. The procedural strategy remained consistent throughout the litigation, with technical handling of evidence and arguments that succeeded in rebutting the attribution advanced by the claimant.
The litigation ended favorably for the defended entity, with no declaration of patrimonial liability against it.
